lance writer ruth barrett atlantic defamation

#LANCE WRITER RUTH BARRETT ATLANTIC DEFAMATION FULL#

“I did do a lot of very deep reporting about that story and I did press The Atlantic for explanations as to why certain things appeared a little bit of about the story and that is very much what I do as a media critic,” Wemple added. Obviously, she has a beef with the Atlantic and I have not yet reached a conclusion on that particular matter,” Wemple told POLITICO in a brief telephone interview Saturday afternoon. “I’m not in command at this point of every allegation against me, but I do stand very firmly behind the work that we did on this. We completely reject the allegations and believe the suit is meritless, will be filing a motion to dismiss, and are confident we will ultimately prevail.”

#LANCE WRITER RUTH BARRETT ATLANTIC DEFAMATION FULL#

In a statement, The Atlantic spokesperson Anna Bross said: “We stand by our full retraction and editor’s note from November 2020. Since leaving the New Republic, Barrett worked in advertising and wrote features for Elle and New York magazine in 20 respectively.įormer Atlantic editor Donald Peck is also named as a defendant in the suit. In the suit, she further states that Wemple “targeted’ her with a “sustained campaign of mudslinging and vilification.” Wemple is not named as a defendant in the suit. In her suit, Barrett disputes the magazine’s characterization of the circumstances that led to her departure from The New Republic. “It was a serious error and misjudgment on my part to allow Sloane to claim this son, but my intentions were honorable,” Barrett told the New York Times following the controversy.

Barrett is a writer whose work has appeared in The Wall Street Journal, ELLE, New York Magazine, The New Republic, and GQ. The magazine further said it “cannot attest to the trustworthiness and credibility of the author, and therefore we cannot attest to the veracity of the article.”Īfter retracting the article upon its finding that Barrett was “complicit” in the decision to include the fictional child, and following a four-week internal investigation, the magazine stated that “the gravest errors occurred in the author-selection and vetting process” and that it was “implementing reforms to address flaws in our systems.” Her bio, however, is a bit more comprehensive: Ruth S.

The editor’s note appended to the article also noted that Barrett had left a position with The New Republic in 1999 under allegations of plagiarism. Barrett, in her suit, says the inclusion was necessary to mask the identity of minors and a parent cited in the article. The longform article, titled “The Mad, Mad World of Niche Sports Among Ivy League-Obsessed Parents” came under criticism for the invention of a child who did not exist. media circles, leading to further fact-checking of the article including by Erik Wemple of the Washington Post, The Atlantic formally retracted the article.īarrett, in her complaint, maintains she was “unlawfully smeared” for “acting in accordance with the law and ethical precepts of the profession of journalism,” and is seeking $1 million in damages for defamation and related complaints.

Lance writer ruth barrett atlantic defamation